<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Audio Stunts Your Growth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benpollock.com/brick/2009/06/17/audio-stunts-your-growth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benpollock.com/brick/2009/06/17/audio-stunts-your-growth/</link>
	<description>Muse on News by Ben S. Pollock</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 06:38:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Oakley</title>
		<link>http://benpollock.com/brick/2009/06/17/audio-stunts-your-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-20420</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Oakley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benpollock.com/brick/?p=1339#comment-20420</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t much go for audio books myself, but it makes sense that they should be quite riveting in a competent voice: Good writing is supposed to sound good. 

How many writer&#039;s tips are about the rhythm and rhyme, the sound of the syllables? How often are writers told to read pieces aloud as a self-editing tool? If you start to snooze in a dense passage or a long sentence, you&#039;ve probably lost your audience too.

I think I like the time control that rests solely with me when I&#039;m reading: I don&#039;t have to go at a narrator&#039;s pace. Rewind and forward seem a lot of nuisance in audio, though I suppose technology is simplifying that all the time. 

I also seem to have a better feeling for space with paper in hand: I always preferred editing on handwritten or typed pages to computer screens. I think a lot of that is upbringing, though. The young generations seem much cozier with audiovisual images, body language and video shorthand than us paperpushers.

And most of the fiction I like is of the sort that would teach, engage and soothe us around a campfire, or huddled in a cave, safe with those we love, holding our fears at bay and looking forward to tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t much go for audio books myself, but it makes sense that they should be quite riveting in a competent voice: Good writing is supposed to sound good. </p>
<p>How many writer&#8217;s tips are about the rhythm and rhyme, the sound of the syllables? How often are writers told to read pieces aloud as a self-editing tool? If you start to snooze in a dense passage or a long sentence, you&#8217;ve probably lost your audience too.</p>
<p>I think I like the time control that rests solely with me when I&#8217;m reading: I don&#8217;t have to go at a narrator&#8217;s pace. Rewind and forward seem a lot of nuisance in audio, though I suppose technology is simplifying that all the time. </p>
<p>I also seem to have a better feeling for space with paper in hand: I always preferred editing on handwritten or typed pages to computer screens. I think a lot of that is upbringing, though. The young generations seem much cozier with audiovisual images, body language and video shorthand than us paperpushers.</p>
<p>And most of the fiction I like is of the sort that would teach, engage and soothe us around a campfire, or huddled in a cave, safe with those we love, holding our fears at bay and looking forward to tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

